The Law Says Teens Must Restrict Passengers in Ohio

February 28th, 2009

This makes a great deal of sense if you stop to think about it. This law is intended to bring down the numbers of teens killed and injured in car accidents. The impetus for this particular law happens to have been the figures that showed 16-year-old teens were deemed at fault in roughly 85 percent of the fatalities recorded for 2006. The figures weren’t that much better for 2007 either.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Family Wealth Planning is the Web 2.0 Version of Estate Planning Posted By : Alexis Martin Neely

February 28th, 2009

Whereas “estate planning” is about preparing and passing on your financial assets at the end of your life, Family Wealth Planning is about making the right financial and legal decisions for your whole family wealth throughout your lifetime and leaving the world a better place after you are gone.

Family wealth is about far more than just your money. Your family wealth is made up of your financial, intellectual, spiritual and human assets - who you are and what’s important to you.

And, I bet if I asked you to choose between the four of those which would be most important for you to leave behind at the end of your life (and you could only choose one group), I bet you’d choose something other than financial.

Why? Because your loved ones can always make more money. But, they cannot replace your values, your stories, your insights and your experiences. Yet, these are so often overlooked and not passed on. Family Wealth Planning is about capturing the assets that are most valuable, and sadly most often lost when someone dies … the intellectual, spiritual and human assets that make us who we are.

When my dad died, he left behind a bit of money, but the rest of his wealth was lost, uncaptured.

I have no letters from him or recordings talking about his hopes and dreams for my future. My children will never hear his voice or know what was important to him.

I suspect it is the same for your family.

And while there are gobs of websites and businesses springing up to help people capture these assets and pass them on, in my experience we are just too busy and it rarely gets done.

I’ve found the best way to make sure this happens is to make it part of your legal planning. When you are working with a lawyer on your family’s “estate” planning, if your lawyer is only preparing a plan to pass on your financial assets, he or she is only doing 1/4 of the job.

What you want is a lawyer who will help you capture the whole Family Wealth that is most often lost and most difficult to plan for … your intellectual, spiritual and human assets or who you are and what’s important to you.

Through a simple Family Wealth Legacy Interview process at the end of your planning together, your Personal Family Lawyer will help you capture the most valuable family wealth you have and pass that on for successive generations by building a legacy library that will be far more valuable than any dollars you could ever leave behind.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Goddard: Cameras can be used for criminal speeding cases

February 28th, 2009

February 27, 2009, 4:48 p.m. Tucson Citizen news@tucsoncitizen.com The legal maneuvering over prosecuting criminal speeders nabbed by speed cameras continued Friday with Attorney General Terry Goddard issuing …

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Jackson Lewis Sends Bloggers Nastygrams

February 28th, 2009

The law firm Jackson Lewis delivered nastygrams this week to two health industry blogs, demanding that they take down anonymous comments and hand over information to help identify the person who posted the comments. Both blogs responded to the nastygram with posts saying that they will neither take down the comments nor turn over any information.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Putting Pesky People In Their Place

February 28th, 2009

 

By James F. Cotter

 Local and state governments  display more common sense than the national government  because they are closer to the people.   Right? 

 Wrong–emphatically wrong.   Historically–and this is true internationally– the closer the   government is to home, the more corrupt (and inane)  it is.

Case in point:

Chuck Sheppard’s News of the Weird relays this item from the Detroit News of 19 December 2008:   ”In December, the city council in Brighton, Mich., passed an ordinance making it illegal for anyone to be ‘annoying’ in public, ‘by word of mouth, sign or motions.’ Violators can be ticketed and fined.” (1)               

If I may be forgiven a certain degree of sarcasm,  I basically love this law, but it could use a bit of specificity–i.e, if I give someone the finger in Brighton, Michigan, that would probably be considered annoyance by “sign or motions.”  But what if he annoys me first?  Then could I give him the finger?

Otherwise, what a wonderful idea! With some clarifications, this should be a nationwide law. If that happens, the following types, and others, had better watch their step:

People whose car horns honk a few moments after they park and leave the car.  Their horns thereby say for them, “Here I am, everybody!“  These people ought to be impounded and their creepy cars demolished and sold as scrap metal.

Kids on skateboards.

Adults on skateboards.

People who use cell phones while driving, or while in a grocery store–in fact, anyplace where I can see or hear them.

People who spout mindless clichés like, “It’s all good.”  Nothing is all good.  God, that’s annoying.

Idiots who say “Democrat Party,” knowing damned well it’s the “Democratic Party.”  (As best I can tell, this clownish knuckleheadism was started by Bob Dole in his vice-presidential debate with Walter Mondale in 1976.)

People who haven’t a clue what a turn signal is for.

Drooling ignoramuses who think Barak Obama is the anti-Christ.

People who bring children into public places.  And that reminds me:

Obese people who block the aisle at the grocery.  Half the aisle (sometimes the entire aisle) is obstructed by their heft, the other half by their shopping cart; and, more often than not, they’ve got at least five children with them, so that your chances of even getting close to the heft or the cart, affording a prayer in hell of somehow getting past one or the other, are absolutely shot to pieces.

Gun nuts.  These people (not necessarily limited to NRA members) tend to be the stupidest and least stable gun owners on the planet, and should not be allowed within 100 miles of a gun or even a safety pin.

People who pretend to be allergic to cats or cigarette smoke.

Aside from the Brighton, Michigan ordinance, Arkansas forbids atheists from holding statewide office or testifying in court.  (Will atheism also exempt Arkansans from jury duty?)   Similar disqualifications for atheists are on the books in North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland, Tennessee, Mississippi and, of course, Texas. (2) Such discrimination is obviously unconstitutional, and has been declared so by the Supreme Court, but who cares?  Certainly not the legislatures of these states.  The Constitution is only a scrap of paper; Bush and Cheney never let it get in their way. 

Let’s expand on this great idea. I think we should ban these people from holding office because I don’t happen to agree with them: 

Muslims

Presbyterians

Baptists

Jews

Eastern Orthodox

Western Orthodox

Southern and Northern Orthodox

In fact, very denomination except mine

Anyone who lives south of Connecticut

If we can make national such enlightened state and local  measures–or as Joe Bob would say,  if we can jist git past the dadgum fed’l guvment–then we’ll have our country back again.

I can’t wait.

 

REFERENCES

1.  http://www.newsoftheweird.com/archive/

2.  http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/02/arkansas_might_let_atheists_ru.php 

 

 

This article brought to you By BreadStreet Investors’ Union at http://BreadStreet.com

“Bringing Investors and Entrepreneurs Together for Profit”

Also see http://www.PrivateBusinessInvestments.com

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

If You Live in Pennsylvania, Do Not Negotiate With a Collection Agency

February 27th, 2009

So, the collection agency is calling you about an old debt. They want you to pay it, and they want you to pay it right now. Threats may come: “We’ll put a judgment against you” or “We’ll garnish your wages and bank account” are two of the most common. They will try anything to get you to pay the debt, or a portion of it. Negotiation will start immediately.

I say, do not negotiate with them, let them sue you. Its not that I need more clients, quite frankly, I have plenty of them right now. There is sound reasoning behind my statement and it is based on several little known facts.

First and foremost, you need to realize what a collection agency is. For the most part, the agency is a business that has purchased your account from the original creditor, often for pennies on the dollar, with the intent of collecting the total debt from you. Its quite a profitable business. Imagine if you could buy $1,000,000 worth of debt for $3000. That’s what they do. You would only have to collect on a few accounts to break even, after that, its all profit.

When the collection agency buys the debt, they often do not get all of the information that they need. I have found that many times the collection agency receives only the name, address, account number and balance due and owing on your account. They do not obtain any account statements, terms and conditions, signed applications, et cetera… That is the important part for you.

In Pennsylvania, a collection agency needs all of previously mentioned documents (and others) in order to prevail at trial if a lawsuit is filed against you. (Other states may have different consumer laws and I cannot speak as to the requirements or laws of other states in this regard). If they cannot come up with them, most times, you win. If you win, that means that you do not owe the debt. The key is in properly presenting your defense. A knowledgeable consumer attorney can file the proper paperwork and make the right arguments to have the case dismissed.

To conclude, I would almost never negotiate with a collection agency in Pennsylvania. You would be much better off in paying a consumer attorney a fraction of the amount of your debt to defend your interests and hopefully make the claim go away.

Greg Artim is a Consumer Attorney based in Pittsburgh, PA. He handles Credit Card and Collection Agency Defense matters in all of Pennsylvania. For more answers to your Credit Card, Collection Agency or Debt Settlement questions, please visit his website at Collection Agency Defense Lawyer.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Choosing a Lawyer For Brain Injury Compensation Posted By : nglover-28669

February 27th, 2009

A compensation award secured from the relevant insurers will fund the ongoing care of an individual who has suffered a brain injury, enabling families to achieve the best possible quality of life in the years ahead for all concerned. However, it is very important to select a legal firm that has considerable experience in pursuing serious injury cases.

The issues are twofold: firstly, legal firms that are inexperienced in conducting serious injury compensation cases may not have an adequate understanding of the costs of the ongoing care, equipment and facilities that will be needed by someone who has suffered a serious brain injury, and on an indefinite basis. This is not a statement that should be considered to be unduly detrimental about such firms; it is simply that without practical experience, the projected costs of necessary medical treatments, care and therapy and equipment may be underestimated. Secondly, non specialist law firms are unlikely to possess care management support teams to assist you in providing necessary care for a loved one with a brain injury claim.

Surprisingly, a firm of solicitors that specialises in brain injury and serious injury compensation cases will do far more than simply fight your case for you in the courts. A specialist firm will also provide a wide range of managed care solutions that include sourcing and managing expert staff, and equipment to help you with the day to day living requirements of a patient with a brain injury.

Settlements may take between three and five years to achieve, and in the interim, the brain injured patient will still need specialist equipment, adaptations to homes, therapy and specialist nursing care. Your legal firm should be able to assist you with interim finance so that your immediate needs are met before the victim of an accidental brain injury comes home.

Having to cope with an individual who has suffered a brain injury is difficult for any family; it is therefore essential that you and your family receive the full support that you will need in the months and years ahead. For this reason, it is essential that you choose your law firm wisely.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Supreme Court Rules Against Summum Religious Group in Freedom of Speech Case

February 27th, 2009

In a case that examined freedom of expression in public forums, the Supreme Court says a city does not have to place a religious groups’ monument next to the Ten Commandments.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Amnesty seeks embargo against Israel, Palestinians

February 27th, 2009

(CNN) — The human rights group Amnesty International is calling on the United Nations to impose an arms embargo on Israel and the Palestinians, saying both sides used weapons supplied from abroad to carry out attacks on civilians during their three-week conflict in Gaza.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

BigLaw Money Doesn’t Go as Far as You’d Think

February 27th, 2009

Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, David Bernstein makes some interesting remarks about the impact of Obama’s proposed tax increases on professionals in high-cost areas like New York City. Bernstein does the math with regard to some of his friends who, though not explicitly identified as lawyers, fit the description:

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

« Previous Entries