How to Stop Ongoing Harassment From a Collection Agency Posted By : TopLawyer

July 31st, 2009

CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER FEDERAL LAW

The United States Associated Press reports an ongoing epidemic of bill collectors ignoring the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and harassing their clients. In 2008 over 71,000 people filed harassment and abuse charges with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). And an additional 24,000 complained to the Better Business Bureau office in their State. The complaint rate has quad duple in the past three years and will only get worse due to the present economic downturn in the world together with the inability of a greater number of individuals who genuinely cannot pay their bills.

What Steps Can You Take To Stop Harassment From a Collection Agency?

Here is the very first thing you MUST do. Fire the Agency! Send them a Certified return receipt letter using one of the legal forms “Cease and Desist”. Although there’s a catch, you must put this into action within (30) days. This of course, is after they send you a written letter making you aware that you owe them money and in detail exactly to whom you owe the money to. For instance, this is the case in the State of Colorado, if you send a certified written letter stating emphatically NOT to contact you under any circumstances the recipient must abide by your request. By law, as soon as they receive your certified written notice then legally they can’t call or mail you anything until they file suit against you and they must take you to court. And you must be first served with a summons before they can make any attempt to contact you. In most cases, the majority never go to court, only a small number will take this action right through to court.

Put the law to good use, and you can quickly and effectively STOP constant phone calls, letters and ongoing harassment by persistent creditors, debt collectors and collection agencies without it costing you much effort, time and money. In accord with federal law (public laws 95-109 and 99-361), a collection agency MUST stop contacting you after they receive a letter clearly telling them discontinue contacting you.

THE LAW LENDS A HELPING HAND

The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act provides the consumer with a legal avenue to prevent collection agencies from continual harassment. So if you wish to avail yourself of the law in this matter, this is what you should state in your written letter and notice.

The contents of the letter should essentially say:

You are hereby notified in writing under the provision of public laws 95-109 and 99-361, also known as the Fair Debt Collection Practices act, that your company services are NO longer required.

You are to immediately CEASE & DESIST all efforts and attempts to collect money owing. I/We will not recognize any collection agency and will communicate ONLY with the original finance creditor (state name of financial institution).

Federal Law: Fair Debt Collection Practices act; public laws 95-109 and 99-361.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

ACLU: Calif. heat rules don’t protect workers

July 31st, 2009

FRESNO, Calif. Farmworkers and their advocates sued California Thursday, claiming its heat safety rules are too weak to keep laborers from dying.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Thursday Legal News Link Roundup

July 31st, 2009

– As if it weren’t bad enough that Stroock & Stroock & Lavan’s typo in a contract for a developer may cost its client $100 million, it now seems that Stroock’s malpractice insurance may not cover the damages. [New York Post via Above the Law]

– Will the blawgosphere’s pervasive criticism of the 2nd Circuit’s decision in Dorozhko v. SEC spur further review? In Dorozhko, the 2nd Circuit held that the SEC can proceed with fraud charges against a hacker for engaging in insider trading even though he owed no fiduciary duty to the company whose shares he traded. [For a roundup of the criticisms, see The Am Law Litigation Daily]

– Interesting factoid from Rees Morrison at Law Department Management: Just a scant 8 to 12 percent of lawyers within a firm are responsible for client development efforts.

– File this one under stupid lawyer tricks: A lawyer was arrested for trying to smuggle cocaine concealed in a one-dollar bill into an Allegheny County Court house. [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review].

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Hawaii Employment Law Basics: Statutory Leaves of Absences | ArticlesBase.com

July 30th, 2009

Employment policies may provide for many different leaves of absence.  Except for leave to vote, no Hawaii law requires paid leave for any leave of absence.  Here is a brief summary of statutorily-protected leaves of absence in Hawaii.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

How to Make an Insurance Claim After a Fire | ArticlesBase.com

July 30th, 2009

If you’ve suffered damage to your property as a result of a fire, it can be a very traumatic and unpleasant experience. Whilst insurance can’t replace the irreplaceable, it is one way of ensuring you’re covered for the expense and some of the loss. However, some people are still unsure of how exactly they can about making a claim with their insurance company and what rights they have.

As with any claim, the first step is to notify the broker or company who handles your home and contents insurance and inform them of the damage. The sooner this is done, the quicker the process should be. Whether for a large business or a family home, it can take time to assess the damage and see a claim through, so it’s best that you have a contingency plan in place to ensure that you suffer the least possible inconvenience during this arbitration.

Structural damage is clearly more of an issue than localised scorches and burns. If the building has suffered collapses or has been weakened by an intensive blaze, you’ll need to ensure that everything is secured immediately; you may need to discuss this with your insurance company as they may have preferred contractors or other certain requirements.

To help assessors and the insurance company you can also produce an inventory of the property that has been damaged or destroyed. This will give you a better idea of what you can expect from your claim as well as something to pass on to those who are doing the assessment. Being as honest and open with yourself and your insurers can prevent any unnecessary distress or time-wastage.

Whilst always honest, the loss adjuster is employed by the insurance company to provide a fair quote that reflects the actual damage incurred. This can sometimes be a little less than some people hope for, so it’s often best to keep expectations down to a minimum. Insurance companies are there to help, but of course, as with any other industry, aren’t prone to giving away more than is strictly necessary when it comes to dealing with claims.

Throughout the investigation you may be required to provide additional information to help smooth along the process and make. Whilst this can be hard, it is an essential part of determining the cause and damage that you’re claiming for; more often than not, insurance companies are extremely understanding and will do everything possible to reduce the stress and anxiety of the whole process.

While we all hope that this never happens to us, preparing for the worst can save you a lot of heartache and upheaval in the future. Having somewhere you can go for example is one way for you to continue living life normally whilst work is carried out in the case of a severe fire. Read through your insurance documentation too. This will give you an idea of exactly what you can expect and what to do when claiming. Each insurer is slightly different, so there is no single golden rule to follow unfortunately.

With businesses who are making a commercial fire insurance claim a contingency plan can be just as, if not more important. In the case of a building being completely gutted by fire damage, you’ll need to have a framework in place that will allow you to continue trading in some capacity, as well as the ability to swiftly deal with the fire insurance claim.

Prevention still remains the best cure. But if you suffer some unavoidable fire damage to your property, don’t panic. Get in touch with your insurers as soon as possible and begin rebuilding once more.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

How to Get Out of a Speeding Ticket - Step by Step

July 30th, 2009






‘;
}
s0 = ‘

‘ + s0 + ‘

‘;

if(document.getElementById(’ad-3′)) {
document.getElementById(’ad-3′).innerHTML = s0;
}
}

if(google_ads.length > 3) {
var s1 = ”;

s1 += ‘

‘;
for(i = 3; i = google_ads.length) { break; }
s1 += ‘

‘ +
” + google_ads[i].line1 + ‘
‘ +
” + google_ads[i].line2 + ‘ ‘ + google_ads[i].line3 + ‘
‘ +
‘ + google_ads[i].visible_url + ‘

‘;
}
s1 = ‘

‘ + s1 + ‘

‘;

if(document.getElementById(’ad-4′)) {
document.getElementById(’ad-4′).innerHTML = s1;
}
}
}

If you’re like the average American, chances are you’ve been pulled over for speeding a time or two.

And hey - I know out of all the times you were pulled over, it probably wasn’t your fault. Maybe you were late to work, having hit the snooze alarm about ten times too many that morning. Maybe you were just getting off a double shift, racing through the streets frantically trying to see a glimpse of your son’s first baseball game. Maybe you were simply tired of driving 65 mph down a straight stretch of road without any other vehicles even remotely close to you.

Whatever the case, however, you’ll always be hard pressed to come up with a worthy excuse to sway your charging officer’s opinion. If you’re trying to keep your money and keep those insurance costs down, try a few of these methods instead:

1) Get Your Head on Straight

Sure, you’ve been pulled over. But it’s no time to panic. Get into the right mindset - don’t be panicked, nervous, or agitated. The calmer you are, the calmer the officer will be. If you give the officer a reason to be suspicious, you can forget about leniency.

2) Turn Off Your Car

This stuff is all psychological. Place both hands on your steering wheel, turn off your car, remove any sunglasses or hats, turn on the interior lights of your car, and look forward. You want to take any sense of tension out of the equation - make everything as easy on the officer as possible.

3) Comply

At this point, never, ever try to argue with the officer. Come on, now - you’re smarter than that, aren’t you? Of course you are. Always comply with whatever the officer says - “yes, officer; no, officer.” Let them take care of the basic routine, first; then you can make your plea.

4) Plead Your Case

After the officer has gotten your information and done whatever else needed done, it’s time to state your case. In a non-confrontational, accepting, and calm voice, simply ask the officer for leniency. Use whatever excuse you have - you’re late for a second shift, trying to get home for supper, etc. Still keeping your dignity intact, simply make a sincere case as to why the officer should let you off with a warning. Admit your wrong-doing first, though!

5) May I Talk to You, Officer?

If the above tactic clearly isn’t working, you need to take on another approach. Before everything else, however, ask the officer if you may speak to him about the violation. Ask him exactly what it was you did wrong.

  • Ask to see the radar. Many states’ laws require an officer to allow you to see the radar gun upon request. If this request isn’t flying with your officer, however, don’t press the issue - you’ll have plenty of time to plead that case in the courtroom.
  • Ask where the officer was when your speed was clocked. You’ll gain information for the courtroom, if necessary.
  • Ask if the officer was moving when your speed was clocked. This can often times lead to a false output.

Whenever talking to the officer, remember to always be courteous and in complete compliance. Never act as if you know everything or make sarcastic or demeaning comments to the officer.

6) Blend In

In the event that you do receive a ticket, try to leave the scene as a non-memorable, every day person. You don’t want to give the officer any incentive to be sure to show up in court. Leave the scene with your dignity and don’t make a mess of things - it’ll be that much easier to win your case at the courtroom.

If you’re looking for some awesome, over-the-top information virtually guaranteed to get you out of any speeding ticket, visit this page on fighting traffic tickets. There is really good stuff there, full of useful, legal, and incredibly easy techniques on fighting traffic tickets

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Bankruptcy: Always a Bad Thing? Posted By : Melissa Gordon

July 29th, 2009

The very word “bankrupt” has the potential to bring silence to a room like very few others in the English language. In a world where we are all, to a greater or lesser extent, touched by materialism if not directly materialistic ourselves, the spectre of bankruptcy is one that can make even some of the most feckless among us sit up and take notice of what is going on. Whatever our own individual and personal views on the subject may be, there is a stigma connected with the concept and the reality of bankruptcy that makes many people stop short of actually going to the extent where they declare themselves, or allow themselves to be declared, bankrupt.

There is, however, a reasoned and growing school of thought that is of the opinion that bankruptcy is not nearly as bad as the reputation suggests. Much though we may fear the response of others when we are in danger of going bankrupt, and much though it limits our financial freedom compared with a position of solvency, bankruptcy today is seen by a wider group of people than ever as being something that can clear the boards for a future in which we will avoid the financial risks that went wrong before and took us into a situation where we had to consider bankruptcy in the first place. To clarify, nobody wants to go bankrupt if they are in a position of relative strength. From a position of weakness, however, it can be the surest way back to a positive future.

One thing that bankruptcy allows the debtor is the chance to make some payment towards their debts, at a level agreed by the bankruptcy hearing – in America this will be held in the state court – at a certain percentage level of total debt. As a commitment, this demonstrates that the individual has acknowledged responsibility for their debt and a willingness to pay it off. For the creditor, although this may not be the ultimate result they would have coveted, it at least allows them to realize some part of the money owed, which would not be forthcoming if the debtor simply decided to avoid all collection activity – a common practice among bad debtors.

Most of all, bankruptcy will prevent the debtor taking out any more credit for a non-specific period. Although there are certain timeframes quoted for how long this period may be, the fact is that different credit agencies act on different data. This credit-free period forces the individual to concentrate on getting their affairs in order and, should they apply for credit in the future, it will hopefully be in more manageable amounts and with a more responsible attitude. Bankruptcy is not a desirable situation, but as far as an individual is concerned it can act as a wake-up call and a positive reminder of how they need to conduct their future finances. In this respect, it is certainly not always a bad thing for someone to go bankrupt – although it is better to simply conduct financial affairs correctly to start with.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

‘Candid’ Madoff explained fraud

July 29th, 2009

A lawyer for victims of Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme says the financier told him during a 4 1/2-hour prison interview plenty of details about the fraud, including how it took place and how securities regulators missed catching him.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Starting a Law Firm Using Craigslist

July 29th, 2009

Back in the olden days, when lawyers sought to start or expand a law practice they’d place a pricey advertisement in a hard-copy legal trade publication or retain a placement firm as a matchmaker. Lawyers would have to be fairly committed to expanding their practice, given the upfront costs involved in finding a potential partner.

But now it’s possible to build a new law firm much more cheaply by using Craigslist. That’s how former BigLaw associate Afif Ghannoum, founder of the Ghannoum Law Firm, did it, drawing on pool of close to 500 respondents to staff his new firm’s life-science and bio-technology practice. According to a recent story in MedCity News, Cleveland-based Ghannoum identified a need for high-quality, competitively priced legal services for new bio-tech companies. So he posted a request on Craigslist for partner-level attorneys with bio-tech experience and chose nine lawyers from among the hundreds who responded. Some of the lawyers come from impressive backgrounds, including a former senior patent attorney at Bristol-Myers Squibb and a venture capitalist who worked at GE Asset Management. Lawyers work on a project basis, with compensation for hours spent on a particular matter.

The firm is still growing; Ghannoum has since placed two more ads on Craigslist and hopes to grow his firm to 50 attorneys over the next two to three years. In four months alone, the firm has attracted 20 clients, ranging from a lone scientist to a publicly traded company in San Francisco.

Though the growth of virtual law firms is an emerging trend, from what I can tell, Ghannoum’s firm is the first to focus exclusively on life sciences. What’s more interesting to me, however is Ghannoum’s ability to attract talent on Craigslist. Back in the pre-recession days, I used Craigslist every so often to find contract attorneys or paralegals to assist with overflow work in my law practice. But even after sorting through a dozen or so “auto-responses,” I found the quality of the résumés and writing samples to be so poor that I never ended up hiring anyone through the site, relying instead on personal recommendations. Apparently the quality of lawyers seeking work through Craigslist has improved substantially, at least if Ghannoum’s experience is any indication.

In many ways, firms like Ghannoum’s — including Axiom and Virtual Law Partners — resemble a high-end contract firm, outsourcing work to contract attorneys. But in this case the work is far more sophisticated than document review and, naturally, far better compensated. Is working for these firms a desirable alternative to life as a BigLaw partner or in-house counsel? The high-quality lawyers named in the article suggest that it might be, but the rest of those 500 respondents could encompass a wide range of experience, from laid-off associates to low-quality lawyers who would have trouble finding work in any economy. Have you ever hired anyone via Craigslist?

[Also see coverage on ABA Journal and The Young Texas Lawyer]

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Public Records Search | ArticlesBase.com

July 28th, 2009

All Public Records In One Site: Search any record you’re looking for in 1 minute!

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

« Previous Entries