Drunk Driving DUI First Offense

November 30th, 2009

So you are pulled over for swerving and the next thing that you know, you are performing several roadside tests. You are then cuffed and placed in the back seat of the police car. He has your car towed and you are taken down to the police station where you are given the “official” breathalyzer test. After all is said and done, you are given several pink slips and left to find your way home because your car is impounded. You have been charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Best Steps to Protecting Your Copywritten Material Once It’s Posted Online Posted By : AmyArmitage

November 30th, 2009

When artists create an article, book, poem, lyrics to a song, a Web site, logo or artwork, they may or may not copyright their work before posting it online. The purpose of copyrighting any material is to protect it from being re-distributed without the creator’s authorization. The reality, however, of putting copyrighted material online is that although it is not impossible to protect, is still remains very difficult to protect.

/>

Many people choose to register their work with the copyright office for a fee before they post it online. This gives them a sense of security that they will have recourse if someone attempts to infringe on the material. Others, who don’t wish to spend money for the copyrighting process, have a few options to protect their work online:

1. Creators can mail a copy of their work in a sealed envelope to themselves, securing what’s called a “common copyright.” The postmark on the unopened envelope will help establish the date the work was created and that they were the original creators. They can then claim all rights to the work.

2. Some writers and artists use the © symbol on articles (or ™ or ® on their company logos or names they have created for their Web sites). Most people believe that this is “enough” to copyright and protect work.

3. Another way to protect copyrighted material online is to post it as a PDF file, with the copyright information in the header or footer. This can serve as a strong deterrent for those trying to infringe on the copyrighted material.

4. Many times, articles posted on blogs, for example, will state at the conclusion of the article, that the article is “copyrighted by (name).” This statement may be followed by other verbiage that permits or denies re-distribution and specifies the details of any such arrangement.

5. Photographs that photographers do not wish to be re-distributed will usually have a logo or a name in the center of the picture to keep others from using the work, called “watermarking” when it is light.

6. Some writers or artists create letters stating that they are the legal copyright holder of the work. They list their name and date on the letter. They then have the letter notarized by a notary public. Most notaries only charge a small fee to do this and banks may offer the service free to account holders.

The best way to protect your copyrighted material once it is posted online is to be educated as to your rights as a writer or artist. The copyright laws of the United States of America are stringent and strict and are put in place to keep people from infringing on the rights of creators. However, when it comes to online material from books to music to art, the law is not as widely understood as it is when applied to “hard copy” material. Protecting copyrighted material online has been a very contentious issue since the Internet evolved.

The recording and movie industries have always struggled to shape their Internet strategies to keep people from pirating their material. The law states that infringement is a criminal offense; however, when copyrighted material is copied or downloaded from the Internet, it is often quite difficult to prove. Chapter 5, Section 512 of the copyright infringement and remedies rules and regulations as defined by the copyright law of the United States of America discusses the limitations on liability relating to material online.

Actually, U.S. copyright law protects works from the moment of creation (or “conception”) so all the details concern enforcement and, to a lesser extent, registration. The government copyright form and recordkeeping allows the fastest, easiest means of copyright confirmation, although the other mentioned methods work, too.

One way to “catch” a person who has infringed on copyright rights is to capture the IP address of the computer used to copy the work. Some more savvy copyright owners have special network tools they use to identify the IP address of computers they believe have engaged in unlawful copyright infringement. It may be difficult to identify the actual user based only on the IP address, as people often use computers in public locations such as libraries, schools, Internet café’s and offices where there are several computers all sharing the same IP address. Even when a person has been “caught” it can be difficult to send notice of possible copyright infringement to the identified user of the IP connection. In addition, the IP addresses of computers often change.

One can do his or her best to keep their online material(s) from being copied, downloaded or shared without authorization; however, the laws still need to become stronger and more widely disseminated. The World Wide Web, although an incredible tool for communication and education, still has some limitations as far as privacy and protection of copyrighted material, but education and continued oversight are proving quite effective.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Police seek ex-con in Wash. police shootings

November 30th, 2009
A man with an extensive criminal past - including a lengthy prison sentence commuted by former Arkansas Gov.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Two Inside Looks at Rothstein’s Firm, Lifestyle

November 29th, 2009

What was it like to work at the Fort Lauderdale firm of Scott Rothstein, the lawyer who now stands accused of running a Ponzi scheme that may have swindled more than $1 billion? Two sources offer inside looks at life inside the now-defunct Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler.


For Andrew Perez, it was somewhat mesmerizing, at least at first. He was just 18 years old when he arrived at RRA as an intern, he writes at the blog The New Argument. Imagine this as your first day on your new job:

My first day of work at Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler was a unique experience. Scott Rothstein, now-accused Ponzi schemer extraordinaire, carted me around town in his Bentley Continental, stopping first at a local elementary school, where we met with Governor Charlie Crist, after he gave a short press conference.


Next, we ate lunch at Capital Grille, where Scott dined daily and had his own table. Afterwards, Scott reserved a bike at Eddie Trotta’s Thunder Cycles. Three years ago, Scott was on top of the world and wanted everyone to know it, including me, an eighteen-year-old intern.


Life was not all rides in Bentleys and meetings with governors thereafter, Perez writes. “From that point on, I actually worked and my contact with Scott was fairly limited.” But Rothstein would regularly “strut loudly through the halls” and “make a small scene all over the place … just to make sure you knew who you were working for.”


Still, even this young intern had his doubts. Not long after Rothstein replaced one recently purchased yacht with another, even grander yacht, Perez half-jokingly remarked to a lawyer-friend, “I wouldn’t be surprised if, a few years from now, we find that he’s been running a massive Ponzi scheme.” Without missing a beat, the lawyer responded, “You know, I’ve been hearing a lot of that lately.”


Meanwhile, the Sun-Sentinel examines new documents filed in federal court this week that shed light on Rothstein’s lifestyle and his management of his firm. “Rothstein’s tentacles extended into nearly 100 corporations and businesses, according to federal prosecutors, from a California software company to a Pembroke Pines night club, as well as equity interests in two banks, a chain of fancy restaurants, a luxury watch business, a mortgage company and an alternative biofuel company.”


The alleged Ponzi scheme not only supported Rothstein’s lavish lifestyle, it also kept his firm afloat, the documents suggest. In one year, the RRA firm brought in just $8 million in revenue but paid $18 million in salaries. “The additional $10 million for salaries, as well as the other expenses for operation of the law firm, came from the operation of, and the funds generated, by the ‘Ponzi’ scheme,” prosecutors said in court filings.


With Rothstein having all that money to throw around, you might think he could have bought himself a better costume than the Afro-wigged, tie-dyed hippie get-up uncovered by the blog South Florida Lawyers.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Hoffman Will Help You When You Have Accidentally Crossed The Line! | ArticlesBase.com

November 29th, 2009

If you have accidentally crossed broken the traffic rules, got entangled into a legal hazard in terms of domestic violence or fraud cases and any kind of misdemeanors or criminal heckles then you may seek respite through Hoffman. You can be rest assured that the Hoffman will be your best bet and the biggest legal adviser and will guide you out of those legal troubles. The Hoffman associates are specialized in legal counseling and expertise and would be a handful in case of DUI Los Angeles and not only that but also suitable assistance in the Criminal defense Los Angeles.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Tennessee Auto Injury Lawyer | ArticlesBase.com

November 29th, 2009

No one expects to be injured in an auto accident. But no matter how careful a driver you may be, others around you may not be as careful. There was a study done recently where it turned out that a great many people drive distracted (i.e. they talk on cell phones, they text messages, they send e-mails, etc. etc.) and are four times more likely to get into an accident than those that don’t. The numbers of such people are increasing all the time and your chances of being in an accident with such a person are greater than you think. If you’ve been injured in Tennessee, you need a qualified Tennessee auto injury lawyer.

Now sure you could go to the insurance companies and try to work out a deal on your own. You figure you’re a pretty savvy person and it’s no big deal to that, but there is one small catch. The insurance companies, well they’re pretty stingy and they don’t like to spend lots of money. They keep lawyers on staff just to make sure they can screw you, the little guy and not pay you at all or pay you as little as they possibly can. The only solution to the problem? Fight fire with fire. Hire your own lawyer.

You should do some research before you choose a Tennessee auto injury lawyer however. Ask him or her how many cases they’ve won or lost. Don’t concern yourself with amounts. Everyone can get lucky once or twice. You want to know how many times this guy wins. If he wins the majority of cases, he’s likely to fight hard for you. If he has a couple of big cases where he won his clients a couple million bucks a piece and you’re suing for just 15 grand, do you really think this guy is going to put his full attention on your case, or is he going to take it on and if he wins, great, easy money for him. If he loses, oh well, no big. It’s just a tiny fee compared to my large cases anyway.

I could offer you recommendations here for a Tennessee auto injury lawyer, but I’m going to offer you something better: advice. Talk to the lawyer. Several lawyers in fact – find out exactly what they have to say and why they feel they can best represent you. Don’t rush to sign because some ambulance chaser got to you first. Talk to friends. Find out who they used. Think carefully, then decide. This is your life that hangs in the balance. Don’t make a rash decision about it.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Contest a Speeding Ticket - 3 Easy Steps to Contest Your Ticket

November 28th, 2009

If you have ever been pulled over for speeding, you know that you can feel helpless to contest a speeding ticket. Sometimes there is a good excuse for why you were going over the posted limit, while other times you really were speeding and feel like you are getting what you deserve. But it does not have to be that way. There are easy, completely legal was to contest your next speeding ticket, and the good news is most tickets are dropped or drastically reduced.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Immigration Lawyear Long Island Is Just Another Relief To The Clients Posted By : Freddy Poveda

November 28th, 2009

Immigration Law year NYC is the solution all the complex problem that is spearheading all the time during the application process. Similarly immigration law year Long Island also offers the similar standard of service.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Man Sentenced for Setting Wife on Fire

November 28th, 2009
A Springfield man has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for dousing his wife with gasoline and setting her on fire while she slept.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

Flip Off the Police, Get $10,000

November 27th, 2009

On April 10, 2006, David Hackbart was attempting to parallel park his car on a street in Pittsburgh when a car pulled up behind him, blocking his path. Hackbart responded by giving the driver behind him “the middle finger,” and promptly heard another voice outside his car tell him, “Don’t flip him off.”


Hackbart, of course, then gave the finger to the interloper who was instructing him what not to do, a person who he would soon learn was Sgt. Brian Elledge of the Pittsburgh Police Department, who was seated in his patrol car at the time. After being flipped off, Sgt. Elledge turned on his patrol lights and conducted a vehicle stop of Hackbart’s car, shouting, “You don’t flip me off!”


Sgt. Elledge issued Hackbart a citation charging him with violating Pennsylvania’s disorderly conduct statute based on Hackbart’s giving the middle finger to Sgt. Elledge and the other driver.


Hackbart challenged the citation but at his preliminary hearing, a district justice found him guilty of violating the disorderly conduct statute and imposed a fine and court costs totaling $119.75. Hackbart appealed the decision and on Oct. 17, 2006, the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office finally decided to withdraw the charges against him.


End of story? Lesson learned, by anyone? Hardly.


A few months later, on Feb. 8, 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Pittsburgh and Sgt. Elledge on Hackbart’s behalf. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the defendants violated Hackbart’s rights under the First Amendment “to be free from criminal prosecution or to be retaliated against in any way for engaging in constitutionally protected speech.”


Sara Rose, an ACLU staff attorney, stated that “the law is clear that using one’s middle finger to express discontent or frustration is expressive conduct that is protected by the First Amendment. The City has an obligation to train its officers to respect citizens’ free-speech rights.” Thomas J. Farrell, an attorney who assisted the ACLU on the matter, added that “the police practice of detaining and charging people for impolite behavior gives the police arbitrary power to harass citizens they do not like. This practice must stop.”


Today, Hackbart’s middle-finger-odyssey may have finally ended with the announcement that the city of Pittsburgh has tentatively agreed to pay $50,000 ($10,000 to Hackbart, $40,000 to the ACLU and lawyers’ fees) to settle his lawsuit.  As part of the settlement, the city promised to “train its officers in recognizing when they are violating someone’s civil rights, including taking action against anyone who flips them off,” the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports.


The Post-Gazette also notes that this latest blow to law enforcement’s effort not to have people give them the finger is part of a growing line of such losses. In the most high-profile example, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Duran v. City of Douglas, AZ in 1990 that a man pulled over in Douglas for flipping off and swearing at a police officer did not break the law.

Read more

Posted in Legal Questions | No Comments »

« Previous Entries